( 3 )
540
:
"having been collected, represents the total
"payments made to them."
In my letter No.53 of the 24th of September 1924 to the Hon: Colonial Secretary, enclosing a copy of Mr. Dallin's report, it will be observed that I gave my opinion that the irregular practice of accepting money without giving an official receipt should be remedied
in future. Considerable correspondence ensued, and although Sir R.E.Stubbs appears to have considered that the system was very unsatisfactory in many ways.
he ultimately concurred with the Treasurer's advice
that it was not possible, without a large increase of
staff, to give receipts immediately, and accepted the
assurance of the Treasurer that collections made after
the daily payment into the Bank would be entered in
the Collection Books and receipts signed as far as
possible. On the 26th November, 1924, I minuted in
this connection to the Colonial Secretary "I regret
to record my disagreement with the Hon: Treasurer",
You will, no doubt, agree with me that the
Treasurer, by signing receipts when possible, or
entering collections after payment into the Bank has
been made, evolved no adequate safeguard against the
possibility of irregularities to which his attention
had been drawn because, unless the Shroffs are super-
vised at the time payments are received, they can as
easily deceive the officer, or officers, who write up
the collection books, as regards the money for which
no receipt has been given, as they can an officer of
the Audit Department who makes a survey.
5. On the 10th of April, 1926, a further survey
was made of the Treasury cash balances, by the Assistant
Auditor
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.